News
Supreme Court Likely to Uphold Material Support Ban
By Brian Monroe
printThe Supreme Court is likely to reverse a decision by a lower court that deemed parts of the country's counterterrorism laws unconstitutional and overly vague, say former federal investigators. The case involves a lawsuit by the Los Angeles-based Humanitarian Law Project, which challenged the U.S. Attorney General in August 2003 over regulations forbidding the organization from providing conflict resolution services to designated terrorist groups, including the Kurdish Workers Party in Turkey and the Tamil Tigers. In December 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld portions of a lower court decision stating prohibitions on providing "training" and "expert advice or assistance" to...
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Subscribe
Learn More
Related News
A proposed amendment to a Senate bill that would narrow the scope of when a person criminally aids a terrorist is unlikely to survive Congressional review, say former government officials.
A Congressional bill that would overturn two 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decisions that narrowed the definition of money laundering goes too far in expanding the meaning of concealment, say consultants.
The U.S. Senate is considering an anti-fraud bill that would broaden the application of money laundering laws to include the gross receipts of crimes and money funneled offshore to avoid taxes.
A Congressional bill intended to counter a Supreme Court decision that scaled back the definition of money laundering will likely become a law, say legal experts.
Federal prosecutors are appealing the dismissal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit of a conviction based on a recent Supreme Court ruling that narrowed the definition of money laundering .
A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision is likely to keep some money laundering charges from being filed, delay current trials and bring a wave of appeals for just-closed cases, according to compliance professionals.
A U.S. Supreme Court ruling that narrowly interprets federal money laundering laws will make white-collar money laundering prosecutions more difficult but will have little effect on narcotics-related laundering cases, legal experts say.
The pair of decisions restricts the use of laundering charges by prosecutors in drug and organized crime cases.
Supreme Court justices heard arguments Monday about whether hiding cash without trying to conceal its source constitutes money laundering.
The case involves the conviction of a man in Texas on money laundering charges for attempting to smuggle more than $83,000 in cash into Mexico, according to court documents. It is the only case this month that U.S. justices have agreed to hear, according to the Supreme Court's Web site.
The case concerns the definition of "proceeds" in federal money laundering laws.
In a 5-3 decision, the court said nationally chartered banks, which are regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and their subsidiaries are not subject to further regulation by the states.
A worldwide U.S. Customs Service investigation, Operation Capstone, for the first time has exposed the widespread use by international drug traffickers of life insurance products to launder their illicit proceeds.