News
Sending Too Much Information on SAR Follow-ups Could Spell Trouble
By Brian Monroe
printPoorly thought out responses to law enforcement requests for additional information on suspicious activity can end up exposing banks to civil lawsuits or regulatory actions, according to compliance professionals. Under federal regulations, financial institutions must hand over relevant data on the subjects of suspicious activity requests they file with the U.S. Treasury Department. Under the Right to Financial Privacy Act, banks are generally prohibited from disclosing customer records to a government agency without due legal process, however. Because violations of either law can mean paying regulatory fines or civil damages, how to answer law enforcement requests is cause for deliberation...
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Subscribe
Learn More
Related News
The U.S. Treasury Department's financial intelligence unit fined a now-defunct New Jersey money transmitter $125,000 for repeatedly and willfully violating Bank Secrecy Act requirements.
Mexican officials will extend until February an upcoming deadline for nonbank companies to implement anti-money laundering controls, according to sources with knowledge of the matter.
Lawmakers should expand financial safe harbor protections to allow banks to better share their suspicions about money laundering and its predicate crimes, a top U.S. regulatory official said Sunday.
As a deadline for the implementation of electronic Bank Secrecy Act reporting approached earlier this month, hundreds of financial institutions questioned whether they had too little time to comply with the requirements.
The New York County District Attorney's Office is creating a financial intelligence unit in an effort to expand its use of Bank Secrecy Act reports, the agency's highest official said Monday.
The U.S. Treasury Department and Federal Reserve Board disclosed long-awaited enforcement actions against JPMorgan Chase for Bank Secrecy Act failures Monday - the same day the regulators punished the company for trading violations.
Six financial lobbying groups are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to shield banks from lawsuits targeting them for reporting suspicions about their clients that turn out to be false.
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office has opened dozens of financial crime investigations since the 2010 formation an internal team that reviews suspicious activity reports, a New York official said Monday.
It's a message that has been hammered home repeatedly by the U.S. Treasury Department: the confidentiality of data included in suspicious activity reports is sacrosanct.
Divergences in international lists of predicate offenses to money laundering have hampered the fight against financial criminals, according to a report by the Australian government.
The chief self-regulatory organization examining broker-dealers for anti-money laundering compliance is again allowed to have direct access to suspicious activity reports, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission confirmed Thursday.
Hundreds of banks and credit unions are likely to miss a June deadline to comply with federal rules mandating that they file all anti-money laundering regulatory reports electronically.
Once confined to large banks, the practice of forming teams to review suspicious activity reports ahead of regulatory filing deadlines is increasingly being adopted by midsize financial institutions, say compliance professionals.
A Miami bank already on the hook with federal regulators for a lax compliance program was fined $7 million Thursday for failing to address multiple Bank Secrecy Act violations.
Countries should ease their privacy restrictions that hinder cross-border data-sharing on suspicious transactions, according to a Toronto-based intergovernmental group of financial intelligence units.
A former loss mitigation specialist at Chase Bank accepted $10,000 in bribes and illegally disclosed a suspicious activity report to the client it was filed on, a California jury said Monday.
Financial institutions must keep a tight lid on investigations of suspicious account activity, even when transactional alerts don't merit federal regulatory reporting, the U.S. Treasury Department said Tuesday.
A U.S. Treasury Department proposal to amend suspicious activity reporting forms could mean hundreds of thousands of dollars in one-off expenses for some financial institutions, even as the plan streamlines report filing.
Account activity related to efforts to evade paying child support, hide assets from a spouse or dodge a tax lien could warrant a suspicious activity report, even if the funds involved are ostensibly of legal origin, say former and current compliance officers.
If a bank releases too much or too little information or takes too long to respond to a request from law enforcement officials, an investigation might be bogged down or even compromised.